Introduction
2010 has seen the Latin American hedge fund industry emerge as one of the
most dynamic sectors in the global hedge fund space. While performance and
growth in most other hedge fund regions remained slow or registered marginal
declines, Latin American hedge funds continued to provide consistent returns to
their investors. The average Latin American manager has seen only two instances
of marginally negative returns in the last 23 months. Figure 1a tracks the industry
assets since January 2009.
The Eurekahedge Latin American Hedge Fund Index remained the best
performing broad-region hedge fund index through most of this year, with its
year-to-date August return standing at 3.97%. Furthermore, the net assets
under management in regional hedge funds have grown to reach US$55.4 billion
as at end-August 2010. This translates into a 41% increase in net assets in
18 months.
Figure 1b shows the growth in the Latin American hedge fund industry
through the last decade. While the total number of funds in the region has
grown nearly four times since 2000, the assets under management have
increased by more than 20 times over the same period.
|
Figure 1a:
Growth in Assets since January 2009
|
Figure 1b: Industry Growth over the Years
The growth in industry assets picked up incrementally
after 2003, registering a three-fold increase from 2004 to 2007. This tremendous growth is underscored by the
performance of the Eurekahedge Latin American Hedge Fund Index, which has
gained 476.69% since its inception in December 1999, with an average annualised
return of 17.70%, the highest amongst all major hedge fund regions.
Although Latin American hedge funds were also affected by the credit
crunch and the financial crisis, managers delivered admirable downturn
protection through this period with average losses of only 4.79% at a time when
the average global hedge fund was down 10.87%. Although total assets decreased
by 25% in 2008 and 1Q2009, due to record redemptions out of hedge funds, the
industry has posted a remarkable recovery since then. In 2009 alone, Latin
American managers posted a massive return of 28.02% while also attracting
US$9.2 billion in the last three quarters of the year. Table 1 shows the asset
flows and performance-based growth in the Latin American hedge fund industry
since the start of 2008.
Table 1: Monthly Asset Flow in Latin American
Hedge Funds
Month
|
Net Growth (Perf)
|
Net Flows
|
Assets at end
|
2007
|
6.1
|
12.0
|
56.4
|
Jan-08
|
-0.5
|
-0.3
|
55.6
|
Feb-08
|
1.4
|
-0.5
|
56.5
|
Mar-08
|
-1.0
|
0.5
|
56.0
|
Apr-08
|
0.7
|
-0.1
|
56.6
|
May-08
|
1.2
|
-0.6
|
57.1
|
Jun-08
|
0.2
|
1.1
|
58.4
|
Jul-08
|
-0.8
|
0.6
|
58.2
|
Aug-08
|
-0.8
|
-0.8
|
56.6
|
Sep-08
|
-1.9
|
-2.1
|
52.7
|
Oct-08
|
-1.5
|
-2.9
|
48.3
|
Nov-08
|
0.2
|
-3.2
|
45.3
|
Dec-08
|
0.3
|
-3.7
|
41.9
|
2008
|
-2.5
|
-11.9
|
41.9
|
Jan-09
|
0.5
|
-2.2
|
40.2
|
Feb-09
|
0.1
|
-0.9
|
39.4
|
Mar-09
|
0.2
|
-0.3
|
39.3
|
Apr-09
|
0.9
|
0.6
|
40.8
|
May-09
|
1.2
|
1.9
|
43.9
|
Jun-09
|
0.1
|
0.6
|
44.7
|
Jul-09
|
0.8
|
1.5
|
47
|
Aug-09
|
0.6
|
1.7
|
49.3
|
Sep-09
|
0.9
|
1.3
|
51.5
|
Oct-09
|
0.2
|
0.8
|
52.5
|
Nov-09
|
0.7
|
0.5
|
53.8
|
Dec-09
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
54.5
|
2009
|
6.6
|
5.9
|
54.5
|
Jan-10
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
54.6
|
Feb-10
|
0.1
|
0.8
|
55.5
|
Mar-10
|
0.6
|
0.3
|
56.4
|
Apr-10
|
0.2
|
-0.3
|
56.3
|
May-10
|
-0.5
|
-0.6
|
55.2
|
Jun-10
|
0.3
|
-0.2
|
55.3
|
Jul-10
|
0.6
|
-0.2
|
55.8
|
Aug-10
|
0.3
|
-0.7
|
55.4
|
Note: All figures are in US$ billion, unless
otherwise stated.
Source: Eurekahedge
Figure 2 illustrates the growth in Latin American hedge funds and
global hedge funds due to asset flows since January 2008. Compared with global
hedge funds, the rate of growth in Latin American funds has been nearly 20%
greater as investors looked to diversify from traditional hedge fund regions in
the wake of the financial crisis. In addition to increasing interest from
global investors, local investors have also contributed significant capital to the
industry.
Figure 2:
Asset Flows to Latin American Hedge Funds vs Global Hedge Funds
An
important factor to consider when analysing the Latin American hedge fund
industry is the difference between onshore and offshore hedge funds. Onshore
Latin American hedge funds are mostly set-up in Brazil, which is the largest
economy in the region, and denominated in Brazilian real. The reasons for a
large local hedge fund market is that there are strict controls regulating the
flow of capital in and out of the country, investors have to set-up special
accounts, pay additional taxes, and all transactions have to go through the
central bank. As such, investors look for real-denominated hedge funds, thereby
creating a market for hedge fund managers.
Both onshore and offshore
Latin American hedge funds have witnessed continuous growth over the last decade.
The need to differentiate between onshore and offshore hedge funds arises from
the fact that a majority of the onshore hedge funds are based in Brazil and
denominated in the real, which has very high interest rates, thereby generating
higher returns than offshore hedge funds, which are usually denominated in US
dollars or other major currencies.
While offshore hedge
funds make up a larger proportion of assets under management in Latin America,
the growth rate of onshore hedge funds has been greater in recent times. Before
the financial crisis, high-net-worth individuals in Latin America had a strong
preference for offshore fund structures due to tax incentives; however, due to
the increasing focus on greater regulations, onshore hedge funds have started
to generate greater demand. Not only have onshore managers recovered all of
their assets that were withdrawn in 2008, the current size of the industry is US$17.2
billion, which is near the all-time high.
Onshore Hedge Fund Regulation
Despite Latin
American hedge funds suffering some setbacks in 2008 primarily from negative
net asset flows, positive performances in 2009 and 2010 have provided investors
with renewed confidence that the Latin American hedge fund industry is built on
a solid foundation. The Latin American onshore hedge fund market is largely
dominated by Brazil, which not only hosts a number of service providers but
also employs one of the most comprehensive regulatory framework in the world.
Hedge
funds domiciled in Brazil are mandated to have daily redemption policies and
are regulated by the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Securities and Exchange Commission of
Brazil). Additionally, onshore hedge funds are required to disclose their
holdings to regulators on a monthly basis while some hedge funds also provide
weekly reports to independent risk managers. The regulators in Chile, Brazil
and Mexico are also much stricter in terms of liquidity, risk exposure,
mark-to-market and net asset value accounting than their counterparts in offshore
market.
There has not been a
single case of fraud in the region partly because regulations require
independent (third-party) service providers and external risk assessment for
domestic hedge funds. The confidence in the industry is demonstrated by the
fact that in percentage terms, the net flows into onshore hedge fund vehicles
have outpaced net flows into offshore hedge funds over the last eight months.
Figures 3 and 4 show the comparative growth in onshore
and offshore Latin American hedge funds.
Figure 3: Onshore and Offshore Industry Growth over the Years
Figure 4: Net Flows into Onshore and Offshore
Latin American Hedge Funds
Head Office Location and
Domiciles
While nearly 90% of onshore Latin American funds are based and
domiciled in Brazil, the head office location of offshore Latin American funds
shows a more global distribution. Most offshore managers are located in the
United Kingdom and the United States, which collectively account for nearly 50%
of funds. It should be noted that a similar breakdown in terms of assets under
management shows that hedge funds located in the UK and the US manage almost
60% of the assets. This is primarily because of larger hedge fund investor base
in these regions; however, there is now a greater diversity in the geographic
location of Latin American hedge funds.
Figure 5: Head Office Location by Number of Offshore
Funds
A key point to note here is that Brazil is home to 32% of offshore
funds, which are domiciled in offshore locations and primarily denominated in US
dollars. Since Brazil itself is the largest economy in Latin America and
managers tend to prefer geographical proximity to their investment regions in
order to better monitor their portfolios, this is not a surprising development.
Furthermore, Brazil also hosts a growing population of affluent individuals
providing an investor base for managers, along with an increasing pool of
talent and service providers.
In
terms of fund domiciles, the offshore industry continues
to be dominated by Cayman Islands-domiciled funds while Brazil, unsurprisingly,
is the domicile of choice for more than 90% of onshore funds.
Figure 6: Domicile by Number of Funds
Geographic Mandates
Figures 7a-7c show the changes in the geographical mandate of Latin
American hedge funds over the last five years. The figures include funds based
in and investing in Latin America.
Figures 7a-7c: Geographic Mandates by Assets
under Management
The most prominent
trend observed in the breakdown by geographical mandate is the increase in the
assets of Brazil and Latin America focused funds. The two primary reasons for
this are a) better performance of Latin American hedge funds over the last few
years as compared with global hedge funds and b) greater allocations to region-/country-specific
hedge funds.
While global and
emerging markets focused funds witnessed sharp losses in 2008, Latin American
funds were down only 4.59% – as such, they did not suffer performance-based
declines to the same extent. This further prompted investors who had earlier
been allocating to the region through broad-mandated funds to invest directly
into funds focused specifically on the region. Additionally, the recovery in
Latin American markets in 2009 and 2010 has outpaced the global markets
turnaround, hence, not only supporting performance but also building up
investor interest in the region. As of end-September 2010, the MSCI Emerging Markets
Latin America Index was up 123.26% since March 2009 while the MSCI World Index gained
57.04% over the same time period. Furthermore, the increasing
population of high-net-worth individuals in Latin America has also provided regional
managers with a new pool of investors who are familiar with the markets and prefer
to invest in the region.
Strategic Mandates
The
strategic mandate distribution of Latin American hedge funds also shows
differing characteristics between onshore and offshore funds, and hence, their
trends are discussed separately.
Figures 8a-8b: Onshore Strategic Mandates by
Assets under Management
As shown in Figures
8a-8b, while multi-strategy investing remains the most popular mandate amongst
onshore managers, the percentage of assets allocated to this strategy has
fallen from 63% in 2006 to 48% in 2010. Two reasons for this change are a) due
to increased risk aversion, investors re-allocated substantial capital to fixed
income hedge funds during the financial crisis in 2008 – a move that proved
beneficial as funds posted a return of 11.27% in 2008, and b) the hefty gains
posted by event driven Latin American funds which resulted in greater growth in
assets as opposed to other strategies.
Among the various offshore
Latin American hedge fund strategies, fixed income, event driven and distressed
debt have witnessed significant increases in their share of the total assets. While
fixed income managers attracted significant capital from investors, event
driven and distressed debt hedge funds increased their assets primarily from
extraordinary performances in 2009 and 2010. Event driven hedge funds also
witnessed capital inflows, driven by the growing interest in emerging markets
and availability of new corporate activity opportunities.
Figures 9a-9b: Offshore Strategic Mandates by
Assets under Management
Fund
Sizes
Figures 10a-10c: Fund Sizes
The composition of the Latin American hedge fund sector in terms of
fund sizes has varied according to the total industry assets. Although the
current breakdown of funds is similar to that in 2006, the main difference is
the 10% increase in small hedge funds managing less than US$50 million. This
group represents those managers who witnessed significant withdrawals in 2008-2009
as well as hedge fund launches. Given that asset raising environment has not
been favourable especially for small hedge funds, new
managers have struggled to raise assets in the last 12 months.
Fees
Tables 2a and 2b show the changes in the fee structure of Latin
American hedge funds as well as Asian and global hedge funds. While the trend
of lower fees has been true across all regions in 2009-2010, Latin American
funds have not made drastic changes to their fee structure. Although in 2009,
Latin American start-up funds did lower their fees in line with investor
demands, the average performance fees of funds launched in 2010 are back at
20%.
Table 2a-2b: Average Fees of New Launches in
Latin American, Asian and Global Hedge Funds
|
|
Performance Review
After posting an excellent return of 28.02% in 2009, Latin American
hedge funds have consistently been the best performers in 2010 among all broad
hedge fund regions – the Eurekahedge Latin American Hedge Fund Index was up 3.97%
YTD August. Figure 11 compares the performance of Latin American hedge funds
with underlying markets, represented by the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America
Index.
Figure 11: Performance of Latin American Hedge
Funds vs MSCI Latin American Index
Over the last 10 years, Latin American hedge funds have delivered an
annualised return of 17.70%, gaining 476.69% and outperforming underlying stock
markets by 211%. Furthermore, the outperformance of hedge funds was
exceptionally pronounced during the downturns of the last 10 years as managers
used derivatives, short instruments and other hedging techniques to navigate
through volatile financial markets. The Eurekahedge Latin American Hedge Fund
Index posted gains of 14.9%, 17.3% and 20.1% in 2000, 2001 and 2002,
respectively, while the MSCI Latin American Index sank by 18.4%, 4.3% and 24.8%,
respectively, in those years. Additionally, the predominance of multi-strategy
mandated funds means that managers also took positions in Latin American bonds
and commodities outside of equities. This low correlation approach also helped
Latin American funds surpass stock markets in the long run.
Within the Latin American hedge fund sector, onshore
funds have delivered better performance than their offshore counterparts primarily
due to the high interest rate of the Brazilian real. The Eurekahedge Onshore
Latin American Hedge Fund Index has gained a massive 679% since its inception
in December 1999 while the Eurekahedge Offshore Latin American Hedge Fund Index
climbed 332% in the same period. Onshore funds have also delivered better
returns in the shorter term, when compared with offshore Latin American hedge
funds as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Performance of Onshore and Offshore
Latin American Hedge Funds
EH Latin American Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Offshore
Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Onshore Hedge Fund Index
|
|
12-Month Returns
|
11.40%
|
9.54%
|
12.20%
|
YTD 2010 Returns
|
3.97%
|
1.41%
|
5.07%
|
3- Year Annualised
Returns
|
9.50%
|
4.25%
|
11.76%
|
3-Year Annualised
Standard Deviation
|
6.60%
|
9.71%
|
5.45%
|
Performance by Fund Size
Figure 12: Performance of Latin American Hedge
Funds across Fund Sizes
The breakdown of Latin American hedge fund performance by fund size also
shows some interesting trends. While funds across all size categories have
delivered healthy returns in 2010, the larger funds have outperformed their
smaller counterparts, gaining 4.58% on average. This trend also extends to the
12-month and the 3-year annualised returns figures, where large Latin American
hedge funds have delivered higher returns than medium and small Latin American
funds. Additionally, this outperformance has led to further inflows from investors;
currently, the top 50 hedge funds in Latin America account for more than 70% of
the industry assets.
Some of the reasons for these trends are given below:
- Managers with a greater asset base are in a
stronger position to get better deals from prime brokers (ie,
negotiate for lower transaction costs), hence, helping future performance.
- Redemption from a few investors will not force
managers to liquidate potentially winning positions.
- Financial magazines and media tend to report
more on large hedge funds, providing greater exposure and free marketing.
- Larger marketing budgets, hence, the ability to
attract more capital.
Table 4: Performance of Latin American Hedge
Funds across Fund Sizes
EH Small
Latin American
Hedge Fund Index
(<US$25 million)
|
EH Medium
Latin American Hedge Fund Index
(US$25-US$75 million)
|
EH Large
Latin American
Hedge Fund Index
(>US$75 million)
|
|
1-Month Returns
|
9.42%
|
11.98%
|
11.98%
|
YTD 2010 Returns
|
3.35%
|
3.91%
|
4.58%
|
3-Year Annualised
Returns
|
7.98%
|
8.46%
|
12.46%
|
3-Year Annualised
Standard Deviation
|
5.08%
|
7.31%
|
6.67%
|
Strategy Performance
Figure 13: Performance of Latin American Hedge
Funds across Strategic Mandates
Latin American hedge funds across all strategic mandates look set to
finish the year in positive territory, with all hedge fund strategy indices
currently in the green. 2010 has seen the spotlight turn to fixed income hedge
funds as they have racked up gains of 6.4% YTD August. Managers investing in
high yielding emerging market debt, such as issues in Brazil, added substantial
gains to their portfolios while arbitrage managers have also brought in profits
of 5.63% through exploiting the various opportunities present in volatile
market conditions.
In the 3-year measure, event driven hedge funds lead the way with an annualised
return of 16.03% amid increased corporate activity in 2009 and 2010. Event
driven managers have capitalised on a busy M&A environment over the last two
years as the Latin American market saw US$164 billion worth of deals come onto
the table in the first nine months of 2010. The value of the deals announced
during the same three quarters last year was US$74 billion.
Table 5: Performance of Latin American Hedge
Funds across Strategic Mandates
EH Latin American Arbitrage
Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Event Driven Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Fixed Income Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Long / Short Equities Hedge Fund
Index
|
EH Latin American Macro
Hedge Fund Index
|
EH Latin American Multi-Strategy Hedge Fund Index
|
|
12-Month Returns
|
8.32%
|
12.76%
|
11.15%
|
13.16%
|
6.24%
|
10.36%
|
YTD 2010 Returns
|
5.63%
|
0.50%
|
6.36%
|
3.55%
|
1.09%
|
4.03%
|
3-Year Annualised
Returns
|
11.30%
|
16.03%
|
11.02%
|
8.85%
|
8.16%
|
9.04%
|
3-Year Annualised
Standard Deviation
|
1.08%
|
12.08%
|
1.90%
|
10.38%
|
4.39%
|
5.71%
|
Conclusion
The Latin American
hedge fund industry witnessed remarkable growth in the first seven years of the
last decade before experiencing some rough times during the financial crisis.
However, even during the downturn, regional managers still outperformed the
underlying markets as well as hedge funds in other regions. Since then, the
industry has posted an excellent recovery, with the average Latin American
hedge fund up nearly 40% since November 2008.
The region's
managers have also attracted significant assets over the last 18 months,
bringing the current size of the Latin American hedge fund industry back to
historical highs – US$56 billion. With an increasing base of local investors,
strong economic fundamental and highly expected growth rate, the sector will
continue to attract an increasing amount of capital going forward. Furthermore,
with the emphasis on regulations post-financial crisis, the well-developed
regulatory framework of the region's hedge fund industry will also be
beneficial in attracting capital.
In terms of
performance, Latin American managers have outperformed the underlying markets
by more than 5% in annualised returns and going forward, we expect managers to
deliver similar results. We also anticipate Latin American hedge funds to
outperform other regions due to the excellent growth prospects in the
underlying economies.
No comments:
Post a Comment